Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Şahika
dc.contributor.authorNalbant, Kemal Gökhan
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-23T11:04:01Z
dc.date.available2022-07-23T11:04:01Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationÖzdemir, S., Nalbant, K. G. & Özdemir, Y. (2022). Extended Residential Heating System Selection Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Analytic Network Process with the Perspective of Energy. CRPASE: Transactions of Applied Sciences, 8(1), 1-8. 10.52547/crpase.8.1.2751en_US
dc.identifier.issn2423-4591
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.52547/crpase.8.1.2751
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13055/243
dc.description.abstractThe need for energy increases due to the increasing population and developing technology. The limited energy resources pose incredible difficulties in meeting this rising energy consumption. Heating systems have essential in people’s lives in terms of comfort. The design of the systems is critical for people to benefit from these systems under comfortable and economic conditions. In the previous papers, the alternatives of the residential heating system were evaluated using the generalized Choquet integral method with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers [1]. In this paper, the authors assess the alternatives for the residential heating system using an Interval Type-2 Fuzzy ANP methodology. The membership value of Type-2 Fuzzy sets can minimize the effects of uncertainties and vagueness. These sets make it probable to model uncertainties directly. The originality of the study comes from the first-time usage of IT2 FANP methodology in prioritizing the alternatives of residential heating systems. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper in the literature that uses IT2 FANP methodology in this field. The IT2 FANP methodology and the generalized Choquet integral methodology are compared in this study. Therefore, the ranking of alternatives is found as A4 (Radiator Heating Systems) > A3 (Fan Coil Heating Systems) > A1 (Unvented Fuel-Fired Heaters) in both methods. But the first and the second system alternative ranking are displaced as A2 (HVAC Systems)>A5 (Floor Heating Systems) in IT2 FANP methodology, whereas A5 (Floor Heating Systems) > A2 (HVAC Systems) in the generalized Choquet integral methodology with close weights.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRashten_US
dc.relation.ispartofCRPASE: Transactions of Applied Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEnergy savingen_US
dc.subjectHeating systemsen_US
dc.subjectHousing warmingen_US
dc.subjectDecision makingen_US
dc.subjectIT2 FANPen_US
dc.titleExtended Residential Heating System Selection Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Analytic Network Process with the Perspective of Energyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.52547/crpase.8.1.2751en_US
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage8en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record