Decision making for optimal treatment for patients with periodontitis based on recent classification criteria

dc.authorid0000-0002-9725-2567
dc.authorid0000-0001-6508-9016
dc.authorid0000-0002-0335-2330
dc.authorid0000-0003-3218-4409
dc.authorid0000-0001-6695-2133
dc.contributor.authorKütük, Ceren
dc.contributor.authorParlak, Hanife Merva
dc.contributor.authorParmaksız, Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorTarhan, Nermin
dc.contributor.authorKeçeli, Hüseyin Gencay
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-22T06:24:09Z
dc.date.available2025-04-22T06:24:09Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentFakülteler, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Beslenme ve Diyetetik Bölümü
dc.description.abstractObjective: The study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and agreement of clinicians with different education levels and clinical experience in periodontitis diagnosis and treatment planning. Materials and Methods: Depending on the stage, grade, and extent components of periodontitis, a consensus diagnosis and treatment plan document prepared by two experienced periodontists was used as a gold-standard. An anonymous survey including 10 periodontitis cases was given to 15 participants (5 periodontal experts (PE), 5 postgraduate periodontology students (PS), and 5 undergraduate dental students (DS)) and asked them to classify each case depending on the components of the disease and select their treatment plan from a multiple-choice questionnaire including 11 dental treatment options. The accuracy of the responses was detected by referring to the gold-standard and inter-examiner agreement levels were also assessed. Results: Except grade, no significant inter-group difference was found in the periodontitis components and this difference only existed in the PE group (p=0.012). PE group gave more accurate treatment planning responses compared to others. The agreement levels of all examiners for stage, grade, and extent were fair (κ=0.366, 0.222, and 0.287, respectively). Treatment planning showed low agreement (κ<0.31) except tooth extraction option (κ=0.554). Both diagnosis and treatment planning responses showed significant variations amongst groups. Conclusion: Although education level and experience showed superiority in terms of periodontitis diagnosis and treatment planning, the results with low accuracy indicate the need for calibration to reduce the variations and enhance the accuracy.
dc.identifier.citationKütük, C., Parlak, H. M., Parmaksız, A., Tarhan, N., & Keçeli, H. G. (2025). Decision making for optimal treatment for patients with periodontitis based on recent classification criteria. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, 26(3), pp. 86-93. https://doi.org/10.69601/meandrosmdj.1554691
dc.identifier.doi10.69601/meandrosmdj.1554691
dc.identifier.endpage93
dc.identifier.issn2149-9063
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage86
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.69601/meandrosmdj.1554691
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13055/954
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001450816700011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynak.otherESCI - Emerging Sources Citation Index
dc.institutionauthorParmaksız, Ayhan
dc.institutionauthorid0000-0002-0335-2330
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAydin Adnan Menderes University
dc.relation.ispartofMeandros Medical And Dental Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectClassification
dc.subjectDecision Making
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectPeriodontitis
dc.titleDecision making for optimal treatment for patients with periodontitis based on recent classification criteria
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
534.87 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Kapalı Erişim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: