Clinical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic ileal pouch–anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: A retrospective cohort from two tertiary referral centers

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0009-0006-1598-020X
dc.authorid0000-0002-5211-1779
dc.authorid0009-0003-2164-5457
dc.authorid0000-0002-5317-8545
dc.authorid0000-0001-9700-0450
dc.authorid0000-0003-1704-2533
dc.contributor.authorSahar, Ahmet Anıl
dc.contributor.authorBenlice, Çiğdem
dc.contributor.authorÇebi, Orkun Harun
dc.contributor.authorAghayeva, Afag
dc.contributor.authorHamzaoğlu, İsmail
dc.contributor.authorKarahasanoğlu, Tayfun
dc.contributor.authorBaca, Bilgi
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T13:57:17Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T13:57:17Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Genel Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractBackground: Robotic platforms may facilitate the technically demanding pelvic and multiquadrant components of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), but comparative evidence remains limited. Methods: We retrospectively compared 90-day outcomes after robotic (n = 36) and laparoscopic (n = 24) IPAA for ulcerative colitis performed by one surgical team at two tertiary referral centers between 2014 and 2025. The primary outcome was postoperative morbidity. Logistic regression adjusted for operative staging; an exploratory model additionally adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. Results: Ninety-day morbidity occurred in 30.6% of robotic and 41.7% of laparoscopic patients (P = .377). Major morbidity, operative time, blood loss, length of stay, readmission, and reoperation did not differ significantly. The robotic approach was not associated with morbidity in the primary model (adjusted OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.20–1.80; P = .361). Conclusions: Robotic IPAA showed no evidence of increased short-term morbidity compared with laparoscopy in this single-team cohort.
dc.identifier.citationSahar, A. A., Benlice, Ç., Çebi, O. H., Aghayeva, A., Hamzaoğlu, İ., Karahasanoğlu, T., & Baca, B. (2026). Clinical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic ileal pouch–anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: A retrospective cohort from two tertiary referral centers. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261490771
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10926429261490771
dc.identifier.issn1092-6429
dc.identifier.issn1557-9034
dc.identifier.pmidPMID: 42751850
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105050631801
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261490771
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13055/1676
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001877454700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.indekslendigikaynak.otherSCI-E - Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.institutionauthorBenlice, Çiğdem
dc.institutionauthorid0000-0002-5211-1779
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.titleClinical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic ileal pouch–anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: A retrospective cohort from two tertiary referral centers
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Kapalı Erişim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu